<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WordCountWriting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellerafter.com/writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellerafter.com</link>
	<description>Freelancing in the Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:13:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The luck of the Irish wasn&#8217;t just luck</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/17/the-luck-of-the-irish-wasnt-just-luck/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/17/the-luck-of-the-irish-wasnt-just-luck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freelancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[being lucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freelance writing tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard work and luck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luck of the Irish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Patrick's Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.com/?p=4375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On St. Patrick's Day when everybody's feeling a little Irish, think about the luck you make for yourself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F03%2F17%2Fthe-luck-of-the-irish-wasnt-just-luck%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F03%2F17%2Fthe-luck-of-the-irish-wasnt-just-luck%2F&amp;source=michellerafter&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://michellerafter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Four_Leaf_Clover.jpg#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4376" title="Four_Leaf_Clover" src="http://michellerafter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Four_Leaf_Clover.jpg" alt="" width="140" height="109" /></a>The luck of the Irish &#8211; a nice saying with implications that good things just happen to some people.</p>
<p>But the Irish weren&#8217;t lucky. They were broke. A <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Famine_%28Ireland%29">potato famine</a> cost millions their livelihoods &#8211; and many their lives. Scores left their homeland forever to find work and a better life. Once they landed wherever they landed they endured grinding poverty and prejudice. Luck had nothing to do with the lives they built for themselves and the generations of descendant who followed.</p>
<p>So on this day when we honor St. Patrick and everybody&#8217;s feeling a little Irish, think about the luck you make for yourself.</p>
<p>Was it luck that you landed a great assignment, the one that will make this year better than last, or the result of years of <a href="http://michellerafter.com/2008/11/26/the-wordcount-guide-to-queries/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">hard work perfecting what you do</a>?</p>
<p>Was it luck that the <a href="http://michellerafter.com/2008/06/12/im-in-a-new-york-state-of-mind/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">editor interviews you flew to New York to do </a>turned out so well, or the result of research on those publications you did beforehand and the preparations you went through on what you were going to say?</p>
<p>Was it luck that your <a href="http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/top-10-strategies-to-drive-traffic-to-your-blog/">blog traffic is growing bigger every month</a>, or the result of the hard work you&#8217;ve been doing to get it there?</p>
<p>Was it luck that when you lost your staff reporter job you didn&#8217;t just land on your feet, you <a href="http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/freelance-101-gettting-started-as-an-independent-writer/">created a business</a>, one that let&#8217;s you do what you love to do and pay the bills?</p>
<p>Happy St. Patrick&#8217;s Day &#8211; may the luck of the Irish &#8211; the luck you make for yourself &#8211; be with you always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/17/the-luck-of-the-irish-wasnt-just-luck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recommended reading for March 12, 2010 &#8211; National Magazine Awards finalists</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/12/recommended-reading-for-march-12-2010-national-magazine-awards-finalists/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/12/recommended-reading-for-march-12-2010-national-magazine-awards-finalists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 National Magazine Awards finalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Magazine Editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.com/?p=4357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To see great writing, look no further than the 2010 National Magazine Awards finalists. Here's a list of finalists in all the writing categories.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F03%2F12%2Frecommended-reading-for-march-12-2010-national-magazine-awards-finalists%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F03%2F12%2Frecommended-reading-for-march-12-2010-national-magazine-awards-finalists%2F&amp;source=michellerafter&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><em>To do great writing, read great writing. Here&#8217;s the great writing I&#8217;m reading this week:</em></p>
<p>The journalism awards season is upon us. This week the <a href="http://asme.magazine.org/">American Society of Magazine Editors</a> announced the <a href="http://www.magazine.org/asme/about_asme/asme_press_releases/nma-2010-finalists-press-release.aspx" class="broken_link" >2010 National Magazine Awards finalists</a>. To see what passes for writing excellence these days, check out the pieces on this list. Winners will be announced April 22. A list of nominees for the group&#8217;s Digital Media awards is <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/awards/asme_nominations_national_geographic_new_york_atlantic_sports_illustrated_top_noms_for_digital_ellies_153765.asp">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Public Interest</strong></p>
<p><em>The Boston Review</em><br />
&#8220;A Death in Texas,&#8221; by Tom Barry<br />
November/December</p>
<p><em>National Geographic</em><br />
&#8220;Scraping Bottom,&#8221; by Robert Kunzig<br />
March</p>
<p><em>The New Yorker</em><br />
&#8220;The Cost Conundrum,&#8221; by Atul Gawande<br />
June 1</p>
<p><em>San Francisco</em><br />
&#8220;War of Values,&#8221; by Danielle Morton<br />
December</p>
<p><em>Technology Review</em><br />
&#8220;Dissent Made Safer,&#8221; by David Talbot<br />
June</p>
<p><strong>Reporting</strong></p>
<p><em>The Boston Globe Magazine</em><br />
A two-part series by Neil Swidey<br />
&#8220;Trapped,&#8221; August 9; &#8220;The Way Out,&#8221; August 16</p>
<p><em>The New York Times Magazine</em><br />
&#8220;The Deadly Choices at Memorial,&#8221; by Sheri Fink<br />
August 30</p>
<p><em>The New Yorker</em><br />
&#8220;Eight Days,&#8221; by James B. Stewart<br />
September 21</p>
<p><em>The New Yorker</em><br />
&#8220;Trial by Fire,&#8221; by David Grann<br />
September 7</p>
<p><em>Vanity Fair</em><br />
A three-part series<br />
&#8220;Madoff&#8217;s World,&#8221; by Mark Seal, April; &#8220;Hello, Madoff!&#8221; by Mark Seal and Eleanor Squillari, June; &#8220;Ruth&#8217;s World,&#8221; by Mark Seal, September</p>
<p><strong>Feature Writing</strong></p>
<p><em>Esquire</em><br />
&#8220;The Last Abortion Doctor,&#8221; by John H. Richardson<br />
September</p>
<p><em>The New York Times Magazine</em><br />
&#8220;The Holy Grail of the Unconscious,&#8221; by Sara Corbett<br />
September 20</p>
<p><em>Texas Monthly</em><br />
&#8220;Still Life,&#8221; by Skip Hollandsworth<br />
May</p>
<p><em>Vanity Fair</em><br />
&#8220;Wall Street on the Tundra,&#8221; by Michael Lewis<br />
April</p>
<p><em>Wired</em><br />
&#8220;Vanish,&#8221; by Evan Ratliff<br />
December</p>
<p><strong>Profile Writing</strong></p>
<p><em>Esquire</em><br />
&#8220;The Man Who Never Was,&#8221; by Mike Sager<br />
May</p>
<p><em>New York</em><br />
&#8220;A Nonfiction Marriage,&#8221; by Jonathan Van Meter<br />
May 4</p>
<p><em>The New Yorker</em><br />
&#8220;Man of Extremes,&#8221; by Dana Goodyear<br />
October 26</p>
<p><em>Vanity Fair</em><br />
&#8220;The Man in the Rockefeller Suit,&#8221; by Mark Seal<br />
January</p>
<p><em>Vanity Fair</em><br />
&#8220;Marc Dreier&#8217;s Crime of Destiny,&#8221; by Brian Burrough<br />
November</p>
<p><strong>Essays</strong></p>
<p><em>National Geographic</em><br />
&#8220;Top Ten State Fair Joys,&#8221; by Garrison Keillor<br />
July</p>
<p><em>The New York Times Magazine</em><br />
&#8220;A Journey Through Darkness,&#8221; by Daphne Merkin<br />
May 10</p>
<p><em>The New York Times Magazine</em><br />
&#8220;Out of the Kitchen, Onto the Couch,&#8221; by Michael Pollan<br />
August 2</p>
<p><em>Orion</em><br />
&#8220;Out West,&#8221; by Joe Wilkins<br />
September/October</p>
<p><em>Sports Illustrated</em><br />
&#8220;And Yet . . . ,&#8221; by Mitch Albom<br />
January 12</p>
<p><strong>Columns and Commentary</strong></p>
<p><em>The Atlantic</em><br />
For three columns by Megan McArdle<br />
&#8220;Sink and Swim,&#8221; June; &#8220;Misleading Indicator,&#8221; November; &#8220;Lead Us Not Into Debt,&#8221; December</p>
<p><em>The Economist</em><br />
For three &#8220;Obituary&#8221; columns by Ann Wroe<br />
&#8220;Danny La Rue,&#8221; June 13; &#8220;Benson,&#8221; August 15; &#8220;William Safire,&#8221; October 3</p>
<p><em>Newsweek</em><br />
For three columns by Fareed Zakaria<br />
&#8220;Obama&#8217;s Vietnam,&#8221; February 9; &#8220;The Way Out of Afghanistan,&#8221; September 21; &#8220;Theocracy and Its Discontents,&#8221; June 29</p>
<p><em>Popular Science</em><br />
For three &#8220;Gray Matter&#8221; columns by Theodore Gray<br />
&#8220;The Other White Heat.&#8221; May; &#8220;Gone in a Flash,&#8221; September; &#8220;Flash Bang,&#8221; October</p>
<p><em>Travel + Leisure</em><br />
For three columns by Peter Jon Lindberg<br />
&#8220;In Defense of Tourism,&#8221; January; &#8220;Unhappy to Serve You,&#8221; September; &#8220;Stop the Music!&#8221; November</p>
<p><strong>Reviews and Criticism</strong></p>
<p><em>GQ</em><br />
For three reviews by Tom Carson<br />
&#8220;The Great White Hype,&#8221; May; &#8220;One Glorious &#8216;Basterd,&#8217;&#8221; September; &#8220;There&#8217;s a Sucker Born Every Minute,&#8221; November</p>
<p><em>Harper&#8217;s Magazine</em><br />
For two reviews by Jonathan Dee<br />
&#8220;Suburban Ghetto,&#8221; April; &#8220;Motherless Children,&#8221; September</p>
<p><em>Los Angeles</em><br />
For two reviews by Steve Erickson: &#8220;The Next Frontier,&#8221; January; &#8220;War Games,&#8221; July<br />
For a review by Steve Erickson: &#8220;No Ordinary Fad,&#8221; September</p>
<p><em>The New Yorker</em><br />
For three reviews by Elizabeth Kolbert<br />
&#8220;Green Like Me,&#8221; August 31; &#8220;Flesh of Your Flesh,&#8221; November 9; &#8220;Hosed,&#8221; November 16</p>
<p><em>Paste</em><br />
For three reviews by Rachael Maddux<br />
&#8220;Cold Bore,&#8221; July; &#8220;Brandi, (You&#8217;re a Fine Girl),&#8221; September; &#8220;Just Peachy,&#8221; December 2009/January 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/12/recommended-reading-for-march-12-2010-national-magazine-awards-finalists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Oscars and writing: Meryl Streep is a good picker, and you can be too</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/10/what-the-oscars-can-teach-about-writing-meryl-streep-is-a-good-picker-and-you-can-be-too/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/10/what-the-oscars-can-teach-about-writing-meryl-streep-is-a-good-picker-and-you-can-be-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freelancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freelance writing tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to pick freelance projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie & Julia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meryl Streep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the 5 Ps of picking a project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Blind Side]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.com/?p=4330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like Meryl Streep and Sandra Bullock and other actors and creative types, writers are only as good as the projects they pick. Here's how to be a better picker.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F03%2F10%2Fwhat-the-oscars-can-teach-about-writing-meryl-streep-is-a-good-picker-and-you-can-be-too%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F03%2F10%2Fwhat-the-oscars-can-teach-about-writing-meryl-streep-is-a-good-picker-and-you-can-be-too%2F&amp;source=michellerafter&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Meryl Street didn&#8217;t win an Academy Award for her spot-on portrayal of Julie Child in <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1135503/">Julie &amp; Julia</a>. But her performance in the 2009 film marked the 16th time she&#8217;s been nominated for the prize.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m convinced the reason Streep&#8217;s been recognized so many times is because she&#8217;s a good picker.</p>
<p><a href="http://michellerafter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Meryl-Streep-as-Julie-Child.jpg#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4351" title="Meryl Streep as Julie Child" src="http://michellerafter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Meryl-Streep-as-Julie-Child-300x198.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="198" /></a>By picker I mean Streep has a good feel for what roles would be right for her, overall and at that particular point in her career. My hunch is she takes into account the script, director, producers backing the picture, amount of time she&#8217;ll need to invest in the project, and finally, the money. Whether she&#8217;s got a good agent or just a keen sense of what works well for her, it&#8217;s made her career.</p>
<p>On Sunday night, Sandra Bullock won the Oscar for her portrayal of a take-charge mom who brought a homeless black teenager into her Southern white family in <a href="http://www.imdb.com/find?s=all&amp;q=The+Blind+Side">The Blind Side</a>. Bullock&#8217;s a good actress too. Whether she&#8217;s on par with Streep is a subject for a different blog post. But Bullock&#8217;s been in lots of interesting, if not heavyweight films over the years. She&#8217;s also been in a lot of dogs: to wit, she&#8217;s the only actress ever to win an Oscar and a <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/movies/2010/03/09/2010-03-09_sandra_bullock_i_never_aspired_to_win_an_oscar.html">Razzie</a> (for <a href="http://www.imdb.com/find?s=all&amp;q=All+About+Steve">All About Steve</a>) in the same year.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s taken the actress they call America&#8217;s Sweetheart this long to grab the golden statue because she isn&#8217;t as good a picker as someone like Streep.</p>
<p>So what does this have to do with writers?</p>
<p><strong>Writers, like Streep, Bullock and other creative types, are only as good as the projects we pick.</strong></p>
<p>Pick a stimulating assignment that pushes you beyond what you thought yourself capable of doing and you wind up improving your writing, your portfolio and your chances of that higher profile publication saying &#8220;Yes&#8221; the next time you query.</p>
<p>Pick something easy you&#8217;ve done over and over again, and you don&#8217;t grow.<a href="http://michellerafter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/the-blind-side-poster.jpg#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4337" title="the-blind-side-poster" src="http://michellerafter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/the-blind-side-poster-199x300.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="301" /></a></p>
<p>Pick a publisher that pays <a href="http://michellerafter.com/2009/09/08/the-race-to-the-bottom/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">peanuts</a>, pays in exposure or can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t pay at all, and you end up frustrated, and quite possibly, broke.</p>
<p>Figuring out what projects to pursue is something some writers are naturally great at. Others are lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time. Still others have to work long and hard to figure out the process.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re someone who innately knows what projects are right for any particular place and time, hooray for you &#8211; I&#8217;ve love to hear how you go through that decision-making process.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not, here are some things to think about the next time an opportunity comes your way or when you&#8217;re thinking about which assignment you want to do next. Call them <em><strong>the 5 Ps of Picking a Project</strong>:</em></p>
<p><strong>1. The project</strong> &#8211; Am I excited to do this? How much time and effort will it take? Does it fit into my writing specialty? Is it an area people are interested in, one that I could make into a new specialty? Do I already have <a href="http://michellerafter.com/2009/06/19/once-a-source-always-a-source/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">sources</a> I could talk to who know the subject? If not, how easy would it be to find them? Will I have to travel? If so, how much time will it take me away from other projects?</p>
<p><strong>2. The people</strong> &#8211; Have I worked with the editor or staff before? If so, are they easy to work with or <a href="http://michellerafter.com/2009/07/22/editors-we-love-to-hate/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">overly demanding</a>, demeaning or rude? Do they make a story better or edit in mistakes? Are they <a href="http://michellerafter.com/2010/01/25/surefire-ways-to-get-editors-to-get-back-to-you-faster/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">quick to answer emails</a> or phone calls?</p>
<p><strong>3. The publication</strong> &#8211; Is it a magazine, website, newspaper, company I want to be affiliated with? What kind of reputation do they have? What kind of financial situation are they in: on the way up or down? How do they treat their writers?</p>
<p><strong>4. The pay</strong> &#8211; Is the compensation worth the number of hours I need to put into the project to do it justice? What rights are involved? Are expenses included? Is it pay on acceptance or publication? If it&#8217;s low paying, can I reuse the research and pitch a different story to a different publication? Could it lead to more work or a contract or retainer position?</p>
<p><strong>5. The big picture</strong> &#8211; How does this fit into my goals for my writing business this year? For my career? Could it lead to more lucrative work? Is it something I&#8217;ll be proud of? Can I squeeze this in without sacrificing projects I&#8217;m already committed to? How does this fit into my <a href="http://michellerafter.com/2008/06/04/making-life-work-as-a-writer-and-mom/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">non-work life</a>?</p>
<p>Nobody&#8217;s criteria for choosing project is exactly the same. But by going through a well-reasoned thought process you could end up like Meryl Streep, a perennial winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/10/what-the-oscars-can-teach-about-writing-meryl-streep-is-a-good-picker-and-you-can-be-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest post: Up close and personal, writing first-person profiles</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/08/guest-post-up-close-and-personal-writing-first-person-profiles/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/08/guest-post-up-close-and-personal-writing-first-person-profiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freelancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-person profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freelance writing tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Olsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing genres]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.com/?p=4294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guest poster Pat Olsen discusses first-person profiles, stories written in first rather than third person, as if the writer is the person they're writing about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F03%2F08%2Fguest-post-up-close-and-personal-writing-first-person-profiles%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F03%2F08%2Fguest-post-up-close-and-personal-writing-first-person-profiles%2F&amp;source=michellerafter&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><em>Today’s post is written by <a href="http://www.patolsen.com/">Pat Olsen</a>, a long-time New Jersey freelance writer who specializes in business and health.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://michellerafter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Pat-Olsen-photo.jpg#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4295" title="Freelance writer Pat Olsen" src="http://michellerafter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Pat-Olsen-photo-210x300.jpg" alt="" width="210" height="300" /></a>When I interviewed professional skateboarder <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/jobs/07boss.html?scp=1&amp;sq=tony%20hawk&amp;st=cse">Tony Hawk </a> for <em>The New York Times</em>, he said he loved skateboarding so much he’d do it even if he wasn’t getting paid.</p>
<p>That’s almost the way I feel about writing first-person profiles.</p>
<p>First-person profiles are stories or columns I report as usual but write in first person rather than in third person, as if I’m the person I’m writing about. I write first-person columns for two magazines and am a lead contributor for two in the<em> Times</em>.</p>
<p>It’s challenging trying to capture someone else’s voice, to find a flow in what they’ve said, and perhaps uncover a theme.</p>
<p>Doing first-person profiles isn’t a matter of simply recording what someone says and transcribing it.  If that were the case, I might write, “Well, um, let’s see, when I was 10 − no, make that 12 &#8212; I delivered newspapers up and down the street. They were pretty heavy.”</p>
<p>You might want to write exactly the way someone speaks if you’re writing a novel, but not if you’re writing a profile. People often speak too casually for these types of pieces.  For a profile, I take that stream of consciousness and make it coherent and interesting. It’s not easy, but this type of writing just <em>feels right</em> to me and usually once I’m happy with a piece, others are, too.</p>
<p>If you’re interested in writing first-person profiles, the first thing to do is unlock the stories inside the person you’re writing about. Everyone has stories. The key to finding them is getting the person to talk about the anecdotes, trips, jobs or other events that bring their life into focus.</p>
<p>When I wrote about Peter Wilson’s career change from public relations to teaching, the key to getting him to open up was asking <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/21/jobs/21pre.html?scp=1&amp;sq=Peter%20Wilson&amp;st=cse">what he missed about his former job</a>. When I wrote about Ray Harris, vice chairman of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, I used his recollection about<a href="http://www.onwallstreet.com/ows_issues/2010_2/lifestories-2665482-1.html"> getting started in the securities industry</a> to tell his story.</p>
<p>Here are a few other tips I’ve picked up after years of practice:</p>
<p><strong>It may take more than one interview to get someone to dig deeper.</strong> One of my first editors made me re-interview someone not once but twice to get enough details to be satisfied with what I’d written. Initially I considered it a failure not to “get it right the first time.” Since then, I’ve realized that it takes until the second or third interview for some people to open up. Most top executives are media-savvy:  once they read a sample of the type of article they’re being interviewed for they know what to do. But many people who don’t give interviews all the time may not be reflective enough the first time. Drawing their thoughts out of them could take several conversations.</p>
<p><strong>Ask the same question different ways</strong>. This technique is old hat to journalists, but still works. If you try it and still aren’t getting what you need, give the person an example of what you’re looking for. If someone’s having trouble coming up with good details of a trip they took, I might say, “In another profile I wrote, the person talked about almost missing his plane because a herd of cows crossing in front of his taxi took forever to reach the other side of the road.” That kind of prompting usually helps.</p>
<p>I always let profiles sit, even if it’s just overnight. I need to read them with a fresh eye to be able to improve them.</p>
<p>First-person profiles are my favorite things to write so on one hand, they’re easy. But that doesn’t mean they’re not hard work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/08/guest-post-up-close-and-personal-writing-first-person-profiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recommended reading for March 5, 2010</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/05/recommended-reading-for-march-5-2010/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/05/recommended-reading-for-march-5-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Moylan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esquire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee Marvin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Runway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommended reading for writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Leitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writers on writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.com/?p=4316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roger Ebert, Stephen King and other recommended reading for writers, for the week ending March 5, 2010.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F03%2F05%2Frecommended-reading-for-march-5-2010%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F03%2F05%2Frecommended-reading-for-march-5-2010%2F&amp;source=michellerafter&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><em>To do great writing, read great reading. Here’s some great writing I’ve been reading this week:</em></p>
<p><strong>More Roger Ebert</strong> &#8211; Chris Jones&#8217; profile of film critic <a href="http://bit.ly/cthbHf">Roger Ebert</a> in the latest Esquire has created something of an Ebert frenzy. First, Deadspin&#8217;s Will Leitch came out with <a href="http://deadspin.com/5482198/my-roger-ebert-story">My Roger Ebert Story</a>, an apologia for a hack job on Ebert that Leitch did earlier in his career, despite the fact that Ebert had once been his mentor (Ebert forgave him via Twitter).  With interest in Ebert picking up, Esquire re-published what Ebert calls the best profile he ever did for the magazine, an <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ylynd2o">interview with actor Lee Marvin</a> that&#8217;s as insightful as it is profane and has to be read to be believed. You don&#8217;t run into quote machines like Marvin very often, and when Ebert did he was smart enough to turn on his tape recorder and stay the hell out of the way.</p>
<p><strong>My guilty pleasure</strong> &#8211; I&#8217;m a late convert to <a href="http://www.mylifetime.com/shows/project-runway">Project Runway</a>. Never watched it until it landed on Lifetime. Now I&#8217;m hooked. I&#8217;m also hooked on Brian Moylan&#8217;s snarky <a href="http://defamer.gawker.com/5475704/project-runway-girls-gone-wild/gallery/">morning-after recaps</a> on Defamer, Gawker&#8217;s Hollywood blog. It&#8217;s not the New York Times &#8211; and it&#8217;s definitely NSFW.* But it is spot-on, and hilarious. I can&#8217;t wait to read what he says about Jay&#8217;s <a href="http://blogs.ajc.com/radio-tv-talk/2010/03/05/project-runway-season-7-episode-7-hardware-store/">trash bag leather ensemble</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Speaking of quote machines</strong> &#8211; I&#8217;ll leave you with this quote from the prolific Stephen King: <strong>&#8220;If you don’t have the time to read, you don’t have the time or the tools to write.&#8221;</strong> If you only know King from his Gothic fiction, check out <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Writing-Memoir-Craft-Stephen-King/dp/0684853523">On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft</a>. Part autobiography, part writing primer, it offers a glimpse inside the head &#8211; and the writing process &#8211; of one of America&#8217;s bestselling authors, regardless of genre.</p>
<p><em>*Not suitable for work</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/05/recommended-reading-for-march-5-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good intentions: writing with purpose</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/01/good-intentions-writing-with-purpose/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/01/good-intentions-writing-with-purpose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freelancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freelance writing tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good intentions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity for writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing with purpose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.com/?p=4208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In writing, as in exercising, you get out only as much as you put in. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F03%2F01%2Fgood-intentions-writing-with-purpose%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F03%2F01%2Fgood-intentions-writing-with-purpose%2F&amp;source=michellerafter&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Valerie is an instructor at the gym I belong to.</p>
<p>Calling her an instructor is a bit of an understatement.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s more like a drill sergeant in a leotard.</p>
<p>Valerie is strong, motivated and incredibly good at what she does. So good people willingly get up at an ungodly hour to make her 5:45 a.m. class. So good, she was recently honored as the 20,000-member club&#8217;s instructor of the year.</p>
<p>What makes her so good? She&#8217;s a big believer in intention, being in the moment and putting maximum effort into whatever she&#8217;s doing right then and there to get the best results. It shows in every crunch and lunge she does in class, in the sweat that pours from her face, and the muscles that grace her frame, the ones everyone who takes her class covet.</p>
<p>In fact, Valerie believes in intention so much she had the word tattooed around her arm.</p>
<p>There are lots of similarities between working out and writing.</p>
<p>In writing, as in exercising, you get out only as much as you put in. Take a half-baked approach to an <a href="http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/asking-the-hard-question-top-10-interview-tips/">interview</a>, a <a href="http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/best-of-wordcount-write-like-a-pro/">story</a> or a <a href="http://michellerafter.com/2009/08/06/wordcount-repeats-handle-rewrites-without-wanting-to-kill-yourself-or-your-editor/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">rewrite</a> and you end up with dull quotes, a boring read and poorly executed revisions.</p>
<p>But put intention into what you&#8217;re doing and you end up improving your writing &#8211; and I&#8217;d wager your relationship with the <a href="http://michellerafter.com/2010/01/25/surefire-ways-to-get-editors-to-get-back-to-you-faster/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">publications you work with</a> as well.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re going to sit in front of a computer for hours a day writing or editing anyway, why not do it with intention. Come up with a list of the things you need to do that day and focus your energy on executing them, one after the other.</p>
<p>You could be amazed with the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2010/03/01/good-intentions-writing-with-purpose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recommended reading for Feb. 27, 2010</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2010/02/26/recommended-reading-for-feb-27-2010/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2010/02/26/recommended-reading-for-feb-27-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bay Area News Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Eggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gigaom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Weber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McSweeney's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panorama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommended reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Godin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.com/?p=4244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave Eggers, Jonathan Weber, Seth Godin and other recommended reading for the week ending Feb. 27, 2010.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F02%2F26%2Frecommended-reading-for-feb-27-2010%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F02%2F26%2Frecommended-reading-for-feb-27-2010%2F&amp;source=michellerafter&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><em>To do great writing, read great reading. Here&#8217;s some great writing I&#8217;ve been reading this week:</em></p>
<p><a href="http://michellerafter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Dave-Eggers.jpg#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4246" title="Dave Eggers" src="http://michellerafter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Dave-Eggers-199x300.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="300" /></a><strong>A newspaper lover&#8217;s newspaper</strong> &#8211; How could you not love Dave Eggers? He comes out with a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Heartbreaking-Work-Staggering-Genius/dp/0375725784">book</a> that redefines the memoir. He edits a <a href="http://www.mcsweeneys.net/">respected literary journal</a>, he makes <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0386117/">movies</a> and on top of all that, is incredibly good looking (here&#8217;s photographic proof in case you need it). He&#8217;s also an unabashed newspaper lover and Panorama is proof, as this Chicago Tribune Q&amp;A with Eggers shows. Panorama is a McSweeney&#8217;s Issue No. 33, a one-time only, Sunday-edition size print newspaper, the San Francisco Panorama. It came out over Thanksgiving 2009; copies are $16 and you can get one shipped via FedEx. Or you can see images <a href="http://store.mcsweeneys.net/index.cfm/fuseaction/catalog.detail/object_id/46ea295f-d5fb-4d20-8ffd-2e07fbd4a13d">here</a>.<br />
<strong><br />
Reinventing the metro daily</strong> &#8211; That&#8217;s what Jonathan Weber says he&#8217;s setting out to do as editor of the yet-to-pick-a-real-name Bay Area News Project, the Warren Hellman-funded nonprofit news organization. SF Weekly.com&#8217;s The Snitch caught <a href="http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2010/02/bay_area_news_project_will_rei.php">Weber&#8217;s Feb. 24 presentation</a>, which was part explainer, part job fair. Right now Weber&#8217;s hiring 15 people, half of them reporters. Interested parties can read more about open positions <a href="http://www.bayareanewsproject.org/careers/">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>No apologies</strong> &#8211; How many blog posts have you read &#8211; or written for that matter &#8211; that open with an apology? &#8220;Dear Reader: I&#8217;m sorry it&#8217;s been 3 months since my last blog post.&#8221; Or &#8220;Dear Reader: I&#8217;m so busy I don&#8217;t have time to write something longer.&#8221; Hey, so what? We really don&#8217;t care why you were away so long. We just want to know what&#8217;s on your mind today. Marketing guru Seth Godin nails this one in typical Zen master fashion in a post called <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/02/why-are-you-apologizing.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2Fsethsmainblog+%28Seth%27s+Blog%29&amp;utm_content=My+Yahoo">Why are you apologizing?</a> The post isn&#8217;t about blogging, but it could be. It&#8217;s also an example of good writing that&#8217;s short: not everything worth reading has to be long.</p>
<p><strong>A picture&#8217;s worth 1,000 words</strong> &#8211; Not everything worth reading is words either. Case in point &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/9ekLbu">this chart</a> put out by the Obama administration showing U.S. job losses from December 2007 to January 2010, roughly the length of the recession. All politics aside, look at how striking that image is &#8211; a deep V that bottoms out right around the time George Bush left office, and starts creeps back up again once Obama shows up. Sure, there&#8217;s some text on the page, but really, what else do you need to know?</p>
<p><strong>Great writing doesn&#8217;t always equal the most page views, but that&#8217;s OK </strong>- Om Malik is a respected analyst, pundit, blogger and all around smart guy who built the <a href="http://gigaom.com/">GigaOm</a> network of seven blogs covering Silicon Valley and the tech industry. Malik came to his own defense recently after another blogger <a href="http://omis.me/2010/02/08/why-i-am-not-sad/">called him out </a>for not having the traffic of a TechCrunch or Mashable. That&#8217;s true, but it&#8217;s not the point, Malik wrote. Instead of going for quantity, go for quality, value and relationships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2010/02/26/recommended-reading-for-feb-27-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New tools for a new writing world</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2010/02/23/new-tools-for-a-new-writing-world/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2010/02/23/new-tools-for-a-new-writing-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creating digital content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J-Lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knight Digital Media Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KnowledgeWebb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News U]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media training for writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online News Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Abel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Content Wrangler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.com/?p=4226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's a list of journalism training websites that offer free or low-cost classes freelancers can take to pick up skills they need to create content online.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F02%2F23%2Fnew-tools-for-a-new-writing-world%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F02%2F23%2Fnew-tools-for-a-new-writing-world%2F&amp;source=michellerafter&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>There&#8217;s a great quote attributed to motivational speaker Anthony Robbins: if you do what you&#8217;ve always done, you&#8217;ll get what you&#8217;ve always gotten.</p>
<p>This quote reminds me of freelancers who continue to query print consumer magazines then complain when they don&#8217;t hear anything. When the print magazine industry&#8217;s losing ad pages at an alarming rate, it&#8217;s not surprising that editors aren&#8217;t buying. So why keep flogging that dead horse?</p>
<p>Online&#8217;s the future, and I&#8217;m not just talking about writing for <a href="http://michellerafter.com/2009/09/11/the-great-freelance-rate-debate-continues/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">content farms</a>. There are all kinds of opportunities with online only-news sites, corporate sites, newsletters, trade publications, e-books, user guides, mobile phone apps and on and on.</p>
<p>Making the most of these opportunities could require retraining. But if you&#8217;re in the market to pick up some new skills, you don&#8217;t need to look far for opportunities.</p>
<p>One is a free hour-long webinar, <a href="https://event.on24.com/eventRegistration/EventLobbyServlet?target=registration.jsp&amp;eventid=194241&amp;sessionid=1&amp;key=C30427CB2A4AADF432D125BD7E8B2F6E&amp;sourcepage=register">Moving to Digital-First Content: How Intelligent Content Technology is Changing Publishing</a> from Scott Abel, of <a href="http://thecontentwrangler.com/">The Content Wrangler</a> fame, on Thursday, March 11 at 2 p.m. ET. Registration is free but you have to sign up in advance.</p>
<p>In the webinar, Abel will lead a discussion with content management specialist Ann Rockley and digital publishing innovator Dev Ganesan.</p>
<p>Here are a couple other journalism training websites that offer free or low-cost classes freelancers can take to pick up skills they need to create content online.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.knowledgewebb.net">Knowledgewebb</a></strong> &#8211; Run by former journalist Amy Webb, this website&#8217;s motto is &#8220;Don&#8217;t sweat the tech. &#8221; Knowledgewebb hosts online and off-line classes, webinars, tutorials and more. Subscriptions are $129 a year or $89 if you belong to the <a href="http://www.journalists.org">Online News Association</a> or another partner organization.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://multimedia.journalism.berkeley.edu/">Knight Digital Media Center</a> </strong>- This partnership between journalism schools at UC Berkeley and USC offers multimedia trainings, bootcamps and other workshops at one or the other campus several times a year. Classes are limited to 20 applicants and are free, with costs underwritten by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation and the Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation. Here&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.knightdigitalmediacenter.org/seminars/#upcoming">list of upcoming classes</a> in 2010.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://journalists.org/?">Online News Association</a></strong> &#8211; The largest professional association for journalists working online hosts its own annual convention, regional seminars and informal mixers and meetups around the country. The group also maintains a calendar of outside seminars and training opportunities (but you have to be a member to access it). Annual dues are $75 for working journalists.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.j-lab.org/">J-Lab</a></strong> &#8211; The Institute for Interactive Journalism helps professional and citizen journalists use digital technologies to to report the news, through training, research and publications. The organization also provides grants to new media projects, and <a href="http://www.j-newvoices.org/site/story/2010rfp/">will award a total of $25,000 to nine such ventures</a> this year &#8211; but hurry if this is something you&#8217;re interested in, the deadline is March 1. J-Lab and the McCormick Foundation also run a separate grant program to fund <a href="http://www.newmediawomen.org/site/proposal_guidelines/">women-run new media ventures</a>; that deadline is April 12.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.newsu.org/">Poynter&#8217;s News University</a></strong> &#8211; Nicknamed News U., this online journalism training program offers 150 free or low-cost classes. The e-learning project of the nonprofit Poynter Institute has more than 150,000 registered users and currently offers courses such as <a href="http://www.newsu.org/courses/smartPhoneMedia10">Mobile Media 101: Producing News with Your Smartphone</a> (March 3) and <a href="http://www.newsu.org/courses/becoming-more-effective-editor-strategies-editing">Becoming a more Effective Editor: Strategies for Editing Yourself, Others</a> (March 2010).</p>
<p>Know of other places &#8211; online or off &#8211; where writers of all stripes can get training? Let me know and I&#8217;ll add them to the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2010/02/23/new-tools-for-a-new-writing-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recommended reading for Feb. 19, 2010</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2010/02/19/recommended-reading-for-feb-19-2010/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2010/02/19/recommended-reading-for-feb-19-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Jones on Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esquire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[examples of good writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Canzano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Orlean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Yorker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Olympics 2010 media coverage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.com/?p=4228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To do great writing, read great writing. Here's some great writing I've been reading during the week of Feb. 15-19, 2010.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F02%2F19%2Frecommended-reading-for-feb-19-2010%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F02%2F19%2Frecommended-reading-for-feb-19-2010%2F&amp;source=michellerafter&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>To do great writing, read great writing. Here&#8217;s some great writing I&#8217;ve been reading during the week of Feb. 15-19, 2010:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://bit.ly/cthbHf">Chris Jones&#8217; profile of Roger Ebert in Esquire</a></strong> &#8211; Beyond the shockingly candid photographs of Ebert, who lost his lower jaw battling cancer, <em>Roger Ebert: The Essential Man</em>, is a touching portrait of a guy who lives to write, now more than ever. Of his relationship with Gene Siskel, his movie-reviewing partner from 1986 to 1999, Ebert says: &#8220;&#8230;we were born to be Siskel and Ebert.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/02/15/100215fa_fact_orlean">Susan Orlean&#8217;s part historical, part whimsical look at pack mules</a></strong> &#8211; Stubborn, yes, but  sturdy too, which is why the U.S. military is using them in the war in Afghanistan, according to Orlean&#8217;s piece, in the Feb. 15-22 double issue of <a href="http://www.newyorker.com">The New Yorker</a> (subscribers can read it online; non-subscribers can read an abstract). This follow up to her witty piece on backyard chickens makes Orlean the magazine&#8217;s de facto livestock reporter.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/humor/2008/06/02/080602sh_shouts_allen">Awake</a></strong> &#8211; A humor piece on insomnia by Jenny Allen, from The New Yorker, June 2, 2008. When a friend said she was starting a blog to chronicle her battle with sleep, or lack thereof, it reminded me of this stream-of-consciousness piece, and how perfectly it captures the experiences of menopausal women everywhere who spend their nights trying to fall back asleep. Not that I&#8217;d know anything about that.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/sports/oregonian/john_canzano/">John Canzano&#8217;s columns from the Winter Games in Vancouver</a></strong> &#8211; Canzano is an award-winning sports columnist for <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com">The Oregonian</a> here in Portland who people either love or hate. I happen to love his particular brand of passion, outrage and everyman charm. So far, his Olympics coverage has been classic Canzano. He&#8217;s taken <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/sports/oregonian/john_canzano/index.ssf/2010/02/canzano_nbcs_tv_schedule_for_2.html">NBC to task</a> for its commercial-laden, tape-delayed coverage (even here on the West Coast where we&#8217;re in the same time zone), called out Olympic organizers for <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/sports/oregonian/john_canzano/index.ssf/2010/02/canzano_a_tragic_start_to_the.html">multiple failures</a> that led to the death of Georgian luger Nodar Kumaritashvili and <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/sports/oregonian/john_canzano/index.ssf/2010/02/canzano_bode_millers_olympic_b.html">decried the dearth of young skiers</a> vying to be the next Bode Miller, a consequence of snowboarding&#8217;s growing popularity. By far Canzano&#8217;s most touching Olympics column was the one he did before the games even started, <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/sports/oregonian/john_canzano/index.ssf/2010/02/winter_olympics_hero_bill_john.html">a visit with 1984 alpine skiing gold medalist Bill Johnson</a>, who suffered a traumatic brain injury in 2002 and now lives alone in a trailer park in the foothills of Mt. Hood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2010/02/19/recommended-reading-for-feb-19-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going for the gold: how to train like an Olympian</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2010/02/17/going-for-the-gold-how-to-train-like-an-olympian/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2010/02/17/going-for-the-gold-how-to-train-like-an-olympian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freelancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Winter Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apollo Anton Ohno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bode Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freelance writing tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to be a better writer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to improve your writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to train like a champion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Vonn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pen Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.com/?p=4212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
If you&#8217;re like me, you&#8217;ve probably spent at least part of the last five days watching the 2010 Winter Olympics and wondering how it&#8217;s possible for the human body to spin, flip, fly or move so fast.
Olympic athletes aren&#8217;t born doing those things. With the rare exception, it takes years, maybe even decades, to reach [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F02%2F17%2Fgoing-for-the-gold-how-to-train-like-an-olympian%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2010%2F02%2F17%2Fgoing-for-the-gold-how-to-train-like-an-olympian%2F&amp;source=michellerafter&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://michellerafter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/WinterOlympics2010-logo.jpg#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4219" title="WinterOlympics2010-logo" src="http://michellerafter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/WinterOlympics2010-logo-251x300.jpg" alt="" width="251" height="300" /></a>If you&#8217;re like me, you&#8217;ve probably spent at least part of the last five days watching the <a href="http://www.vancouver2010.com/">2010 Winter Olympics</a> and wondering how it&#8217;s possible for the human body to spin, flip, fly or move so fast.</p>
<p>Olympic athletes aren&#8217;t born doing those things. With the rare exception, it takes years, maybe even decades, to reach that level of achievement &#8211; something spectators like you and me understand almost intuitively.</p>
<p>Yet when it comes to our work as writers, we expect to come out of the gate a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_D._Kristof">Nicholas Kristoff</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seymour_Hersh">Seymour Hersh</a>.</p>
<p>But writing, like sports, doesn&#8217;t work that way. To attain a certain level of mastery takes time and effort. While it might not take the 10,000 hours Malcolm Gladwell says it does in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Outliers-Story-Success-Malcolm-Gladwell/dp/0316017922">Outliers</a>, it&#8217;s not something you can start out at and be perfect right away (unless you&#8217;re a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/books/29salinger.html">J.D. Salinger</a>, and face it, we&#8217;re not).</p>
<p>Good writing takes hard work. To be an Olympic caliber writer takes Olympic caliber training.</p>
<p><strong>So how do you train like a gold-medal champion?</strong><br />
<strong><br />
Specialize.</strong> You don&#8217;t see Apollo Anton Ohno competing in short-track speed skating and figure skating. Ohno&#8217;s a champion because he&#8217;s devoted umpteen years of his life to one thing and one thing only, and that devotion&#8217;s made him <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/olympics_blog/2010/02/sarah-d-morris-a-love-affair-with-shorttrack-speedskating.html">the most decorated American Winter Olympian ever</a>. To get good at something specialize. If you want to be a business reporter, pitch and take assignments to write business stories. If you want to be a copywriter, actively seek out copywriting opportunities. Ditto for any other niche writing market.</p>
<p><strong>Find a coach.</strong> Watch the Olympic figure skaters before and after they enter the rink. There&#8217;s always a coach there to encourage them before they&#8217;re on and critique them once they&#8217;re done. Writers need coaches too. You could hire a coach, but you don&#8217;t have to. Coaching could come from attending a writer&#8217;s workshop, reading <a href="http://michellerafter.com/2009/08/11/william-zinsser-and-on-writing-well/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">books on the craft</a>, or putting some really <a href="http://michellerafter.com/2009/09/21/wordcount-lands-on-list-of-top-10-blogs-for-writers/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">good writing blogs</a> on your RSS reader (including this one, hopefully).</p>
<p><strong>Practice.</strong> Olympic athletes are in the spotlight once every four years, but they practice constantly. Practice is what allows U.S. snowboard superpipe champ <a href="http://www.shaunwhite.com/">Shaun White</a> to do tricks like the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIr2ki4nWkU">Double McTwist 1260</a>, which he invented and so far has been the only rider to have landed successfully. Thankfully, practicing writing is a little easier than doing double flipping, triple twisting maneuvers on a snowboard &#8211; although getting a reluctant interviewee to open up sometimes feels like it. The best practice for writers is writing. If assignments aren&#8217;t pouring in, aim your writing energies at <a href="http://michellerafter.com/2008/10/31/how-to-write-queries-that-sell/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">query letters</a>, keeping a journal, <a href="http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/10-reasons-every-freelance-writer-should-have-a-blog/">blogging</a> or taking a writing class &#8211; anything that helps sharpen your skills.</p>
<p><strong>Use the right equipment.</strong> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bode_Miller">Bode Miller</a> didn&#8217;t win a bronze medal in the downhill on any old pair of skis. He used the right equipment and tuned it to the conditions on the mountain that day. To get the most out of their work, writers need equipment that&#8217;s tuned to their special needs too: a laptop that has enough umph to be a main workstation yet is light enough to take on the road, a telephone headset and Skype, a smartphone with a built-in camera, software for making podcasts.</p>
<p><strong>Surround yourself with like-minded professionals</strong>. Skiers on the World Cup circuit travel, train and live together &#8211; U.S. skier<a href="http://twitter.com/Lindseyvonn"> Lindsey Vonn</a>&#8217;s chief nemesis on the World Cup circuit is also her best friend, Germany&#8217;s Maria Riesch. This is a hard one for me, because it&#8217;s against my naturally competitive nature to want to share too much with writers who could potentially take work away from me. But the reality is, there&#8217;s no way I could write all the stories there are to write about topics I cover. So why not accept that and spread the wealth? And good karma has a way of finding its way back to you<strong>. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Visualize greatness.</strong> Olympic athletes train mentally as well as physically, picturing themselves performing at their peak. When I was 15 my parents sent me to a weekend seminar led by a local high-school football coach whose specialty was teaching athletes how to visual success. Over two days we learned what affirmations were and how to use positive mental imagery to picture ourselves doing whatever it was we wanted to do. Sounds hokey but it works, especially the <a href="http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/flourish/200912/seeing-is-believing-the-power-visualization">visualization</a>. I&#8217;ve continued to use some of the techniques up to this day. If you think of yourself as a successfully employed freelance writer, you will be. That doesn&#8217;t mean that all you have to do is think about it. You have to do the things that will make you successful &#8211; the querying, the interviews, the writing, the rewriting.  But by picturing yourself as successful you won&#8217;t be mentally sabotaging everything else you&#8217;re doing to get there. And when you&#8217;ve got that big interview or have a call with an editor at your dream magazine you&#8217;ll be calm, cool and collected because you&#8217;ve been there before, in your head.</p>
<p>* * *</p>
<p>If the Olympics inspire you, you might want to check out the <strong>Pen Olympics</strong> now going on at <a href="http://edittorrent.blogspot.com/2010/02/announcing-pen-olympics.html">Edittorent</a>, another blog for writers. There&#8217;s a new competition every day &#8211; Monday&#8217;s was <a href="http://edittorrent.blogspot.com/2010/02/heat-3-doggerel-sled-racing.html">Doggerel Sled Racing</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2010/02/17/going-for-the-gold-how-to-train-like-an-olympian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
