<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WordCount &#187; UK Times on Steve Jobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellerafter.com/tag/uk-times-on-steve-jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellerafter.com</link>
	<description>Freelancing in the Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>First v. best</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2009/08/25/first-v-best/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2009/08/25/first-v-best/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freelancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[being first with a story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breaking news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freelance writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Times on Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=3544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it better to be first with a story, or best?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan Appleyard&#8217;s recent UK Times <a href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6797859.ece">profile of Steve Jobs and Apple</a> is a thing of beauty.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-3567" title="UK Times logo" src="http://michellerafter.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/uk-times-logo.gif?w=300" alt="UK Times logo" width="300" height="45" />The 4,300-word profile explains in great detail Jobs&#8217; &#8220;narcissistic personality&#8221; and the incredible, almost mafia-esque code of silence surrounding product development at a company that&#8217;s led the world in technology innovation from the Mac to the iPod to the iPhone.</p>
<p>The story also appears months after the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124546193182433491.html">Wall Street Journal was first to report on Jobs&#8217; liver transplant</a>, an event that Apple never publicly discussed despite persistent rumors of the Jobs&#8217; continuing poor health.</p>
<p><strong>Which begs the question: is it better to have a story first or wait and come out with the best?</strong></p>
<p>In this case, Appleyard and the Times opted to be best, or at least the most in-depth, a bet that paid off with a piece filled with nuance that takes time and reflection to get. It&#8217;s also got the kind of quotes that make you think, how did he get people to say that on the record?</p>
<p>Which route should freelancers take?</p>
<p>The answer depends on the kind of writing business you want to cultivate and that depends in part on the type of  writing you&#8217;re good at.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re getting into freelancing after leaving a daily newspaper or just like the thrill of the hunt, you&#8217;ve probably got a well-developed news sense and lots of contacts, making it natural to pursue writing jobs that let you go after breaking news. If you prefer to dig deeper into a subject or let the ramifications of the day&#8217;s news simmer into a longer stew of a thought piece, you&#8217;d be better off writing features and profiles.</p>
<p>Whether you pursue first v. best also depends on the publications you work for or aspire to work for.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-3560" title="TMZ reports Michael Jackson's death" src="http://michellerafter.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/tmz-reports-michael-jacksons-death.jpeg?w=300" alt="TMZ reports Michael Jackson's death" width="240" height="206" />If you cover the celebrity beat for <a href="http://www.tmz.com/">TMZ</a>, <a href="http://gawker.com/">Gawker</a> or another tabloid you&#8217;re earn high praise, tons of traffic and the career props and money that come with them if you&#8217;re first with the news that, say, <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/06/25/michael-jackson-dies-death-dead-cardiac-arrest/">Michael Jackson&#8217;s died</a>. Ditto if you write for <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com">TechCrunch</a>, <a href="http://www.mashable.com">Mashable</a>, <a href="http://www.politico.com">Politico</a> or any other publication that <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/in-our-inbox-hundreds-of-confidential-twitter-documents/">breaks industry news</a>.</p>
<p>Those qualities aren&#8217;t as important to other publications like <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/">The New Yorker</a>, <a href="http://www.goodhousekeeping.com/">Good Housekeeping</a> or <a href="http://outside.away.com/">Outside</a>, which due to their editorial philosophy or article lead time for the print versions of their publications, prefer to present readers with the long view.</p>
<p>Then there are markets that run both breaking news and features.</p>
<p>Some writers are better at one, some at the other. Some straddle the fence, doing one or the other depending on which client they&#8217;re working for that week. I&#8217;m in this camp, and it&#8217;s not always easy, especially if I&#8217;m doing one kind of story for one publication at the same time I&#8217;m doing  the other for a second.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m working on something right now that falls into the category of later but better, or so I hope. When the piece is online, I&#8217;ll post a link so you can see how I did.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the focus of your writing business &#8211; being first or being best?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2009/08/25/first-v-best/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 515/531 objects using disk: basic

Served from: michellerafter.com @ 2012-05-25 15:01:07 -->
