<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WordCount &#187; PBS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellerafter.com/tag/pbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellerafter.com</link>
	<description>Freelancing in the Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:55:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Time out: why writers need to unplug on the weekends</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/06/13/why-writers-need-to-unplug-on-the-weekends/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2008/06/13/why-writers-need-to-unplug-on-the-weekends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freelancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Glaser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taking a break from the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology sabbath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology sabbatical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you use rechargeable batteries you know they don&#8217;t last forever. They work, they run low and then you recharge them. Writers are like that too. We can&#8217;t work non-stop without the juices running low. But if you&#8217;re like me and you spend your work life tied to a computer, email and the Internet, it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you use rechargeable batteries you know they don&#8217;t last forever. They work, they run low and then you recharge them.</p>
<p>Writers are like that too. We can&#8217;t work non-stop without the juices running low. But if you&#8217;re like me and you spend your work life tied to a computer, email and the Internet, it&#8217;s not always easy to unplug.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s worth it. And more writers are talking about it. One example is <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/info/about-mark.html" class="broken_link">Mark Glaser</a>, a writer, columnist and blogger who writes the <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/">MediaShift</a> column on the <a href="http://www.pbs.org">PBS.org</a> Website. Glaser, who has written for <a href="http://www.latimes.com">Los Angeles Times</a>, <a href="http://www.cnet.com">CNET</a> and The Industry Standard (<em>Disclaimer: I wrote for <strong>TIS</strong> too but didn&#8217;t know Glaser</em>), recently wrote about his quest for more time unplugged from his computer in a column called <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2008/06/digging_deepertechnology_sabba.html">&#8216;Technology Sabbath&#8217; offers one day to unplug</a>. He writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;being that I am Jewish — though not very religious — I decided to shut down the computer each Friday night at sunset until Saturday at sunset, the traditional time of the Jewish Sabbath. I make exceptions when I need to get directions or check for a personal email. I still use my cell phone but try to limit it to personal calls only. While this day of technological rest can be a difficult routine, it has allowed me to stretch my time, spend more hours outside and be with people more in face-to-face settings.</p>
<p>And I’m not alone. The concept of a &#8220;technology sabbath&#8221; is becoming more widespread, both in religious circles and among bloggers and media people who are overwhelmed with the always-on nature of the broadband Internet and smartphones. And that overwhelming feeling is exacerbated by instant messaging, social networking and services such as <a href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter</a>, that allow us to do more informal communications electronically rather than in person.</p></blockquote>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t consciously decided to take a tech break every week. But in the past two to three months &#8211; especially since I&#8217;ve been blogging more regularly &#8211; I&#8217;ve sought out the solace of hiking in the woods almost every weekend as an antidote to the amount of time I spend in front of a screen. Luckily for me, the woodsy trails of Portland&#8217;s <a href="http://www.portlandonline.com/parks/finder/index.cfm?PropertyID=127&amp;action=ViewPark">Forest Park</a> are less than 10 minutes away. There&#8217;s something incredibly regenerating about being in a place that&#8217;s the antithesis of the plugged in world. It&#8217;s like a tonic, and only takes an hour or two.</p>
<p>What about you? Do you unplug on a regular basis? What do you do to recharge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2008/06/13/why-writers-need-to-unplug-on-the-weekends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adaptations</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/01/16/adaptations/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2008/01/16/adaptations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books adapted to movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Austen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masterpiece Theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/2008/01/16/adaptations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The venerable PBS Sunday night miniseries Masterpiece Theater is mounting a Jane Austen retrospective, airing new and old versions of made-for-TV movies of all of her novels. It&#8217;s a big deal for Austen&#8217;s legion of fans, but let&#8217;s hope the first production isn&#8217;t representative of things to come. The version of Persuasion that aired on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Persuasian, 2007" href="http://michellerafter.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/persuasion.jpg"><img src="http://michellerafter.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/persuasion.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Persuasian, 2007" /></a></p>
<p>The venerable <a href="http://www.pbs.org">PBS</a> Sunday night miniseries <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/masterpiece/">Masterpiece </a><a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/masterpiece/">Theater</a> is mounting a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Austen">Ja</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Austen">ne Austen</a> retrospective, airing new and old versions of made-for-TV movies of all of her novels. It&#8217;s a big deal for Austen&#8217;s legion of fans, but let&#8217;s hope the first production isn&#8217;t representative of things to come. The  version of <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/masterpiece/persuasion/index.html"><em>Persuasion</em></a> that aired on Sunday wasn&#8217;t very persuasive. In fact, it was bad. At 90 minutes, it felt rushed, even though big chunks of plot and subplot were missing. Some of the acting was over the top. And that ending! Heroine Anne Elliott running through the streets of Bath  to meet Capt. Wentworth and kissing in public! On the lips! Austen would blush. I&#8217;m not alone in my opinion: Austen blogs <a href="http://janitesonthejames.blogspot.com/">like this one</a> and PBS&#8217; own <a href="http://www.pbs.org/nights/blog/">Remotely Connected</a> blog are filled with comments from viewers who hated it. On the other hand, I still remember the thrill I got watching the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114117/">1995 Amanda Root/Ciaran Hinds version</a> when they finally hooked up (so to speak).</p>
<p>Adapting books to the big &#8211; or little &#8211; screen is tricky. You have to pare the story down to a workable length without sacrificing too much of the plot, yet leave in enough of the original so people who loved the book want to see the on-air version. Sometimes adaptations are better than the book &#8211; <a href="http://www.pbs.org/nights/blog/"><em>The Devil Wears Prada</em></a> is a notable example. But sometimes they fail miserably. Who remembers <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087428/"><em>Hotel New Hampshire</em></a>. Yuck.</p>
<p>Here are some adaptations I love, hate and couldn&#8217;t bear to bring myself to watch because I loved the book too much to take the chance. I&#8217;d love to hear what your favorite or least favorites have been. Write me!</p>
<p>Loved: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0116209/"><em>The English Patient</em></a>, <em>The Devil Wears Prada</em>, <em>The Great Gatsby</em></p>
<p>Hated: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0159365/">Cold Mountain</a>, <em>Hotel New Hampshire</em></p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t bring myself to see: <em>The Joy Luck Club</em>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0783233/"><em>Atonement</em></a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0256276/"><em>Possession </em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2008/01/16/adaptations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 688/688 objects using disk: basic

Served from: michellerafter.com @ 2012-05-25 09:12:28 -->
