<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WordCount &#187; National Magazine Awards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellerafter.com/tag/national-magazine-awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellerafter.com</link>
	<description>Freelancing in the Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:55:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Magazines: The good, the bad and the ugly</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/05/04/magazines-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2008/05/04/magazines-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 14:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Magazine Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Guide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First the good. This year&#8217;s National Magazine Awards were announced a couple days ago. National Geographic won three, followed by Vanity Fair, which amidst the uproar over its suggestive pictures of squeeky-clean tween queen Miley Cyrus, grabbed two. Conde Nast Portfolio, the glossy monthly that debuted a year ago, took home one &#8211; not bad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>First the good.</strong> This year&#8217;s <a href="http://www.magazine.org/editorial/about_asme/press_releases/27099.cfm">National Magazine Awards</a> were announced a couple days ago. <a href="http://www.nationalgeographic.com/">National Geographic</a> won three, followed by <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/">Vanity Fair</a>, which amidst the uproar over its suggestive pictures of squeeky-clean tween queen Miley Cyrus, grabbed two. <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/">Conde Nast Portfolio</a>, the glossy monthly that debuted a year ago, took home one &#8211; not bad for a rookie.</p>
<p><strong>Now the bad.</strong> Given by the <a href="http://www.magazine.org/home/">Magazine Publishers of America</a>, the Ellies are considered one of the high points of the year for the magazine industry. While magazine publishers don&#8217;t have as much to worry about these days as newspapers, these aren&#8217;t exactly the industry&#8217;s salad days. Ad spending in consumer magazines is expected to grow a mere 3.6 percent this year, compared with a 14.4 percent jump in online advertising, according to <a href="http://www.tns-mi.com/news/01072008.htm">this report</a> from TNS Media Intelligence, a custom researcher.</p>
<p>Some one-time venerable magazines are on their last legs. Nikki Finke reported on her Deadline Hollywood Daily blog on May 2 that <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/source-tv-guide-is-getting-gutted-today/">TV Guide&#8217;s editorial staff has been gutted</a> and the magazine is in danger of being folded. It&#8217;s hard to believe. In my magazine journalism classes in grad school, <a href="http://www.tvguide.com/">TV Guide</a> was always held up as the epitome of magazine journalism success, with a bigger readership than any other publication in the country, with the possible exception of <a href="http://www.rd.com/">Reader&#8217;s Digest</a>. According to Finke, TVG now  has about 3.5 million subscribers, not counting the people who click on the TV Guide channel to see what to watch.<br />
<strong><br />
And now the ugly.</strong> Sex magazines by and about college students. I won&#8217;t post live links to any here -sorry, I&#8217;m just not that kinda gal &#8211; but you can read all about it in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/04/magazine/04sexmagazines.t.html?_r=1&amp;scp=7&amp;sq=porn+universities&amp;st=nyt&amp;oref=slogin">this article</a> from 2007 from the New York Times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2008/05/04/magazines-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 538/540 objects using disk: basic

Served from: michellerafter.com @ 2012-05-25 06:39:56 -->
