<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WordCountMediaShift</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellerafter.com/tag/mediashift/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellerafter.com</link>
	<description>Freelancing in the Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:05:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Around the Web: the changing newsroom, young reporters, Twitter</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/07/28/around-the-web/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2008/07/28/around-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Dickerson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaShift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nieman Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Changing Newsroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[young journalists leaving newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Where are newspapers headed? It&#8217;s hard to say given the varying tone of reporting on the newspaper industry and fate of newspaper reporters. On one hand, Journalism.org&#8217;s The Changing Newsroom study describes today&#8217;s newspapers as being run by smaller, younger, more tech-savvy staff. But Mark Glaser, writing in his MediaShift column at PBS.org, says papers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2008%2F07%2F28%2Faround-the-web%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2008%2F07%2F28%2Faround-the-web%2F&amp;source=michellerafter&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Where are newspapers headed? It&#8217;s hard to say given the varying tone of reporting on the newspaper industry and fate of newspaper reporters. On one hand, Journalism.org&#8217;s The Changing Newsroom study describes today&#8217;s newspapers as being run by smaller, younger, more tech-savvy staff. But Mark Glaser, writing in his MediaShift column at PBS.org, says papers need to do a better job innovating or they&#8217;ll lose those young, new media-savvy writers. Meanwhile, writers are still trying to figure out <a href="http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/social-network-overload-and-why-i-dont-do-twitter/">where Twitter fits in</a> as a form of reporting and writing. Read on:</p>
<p><strong>Out with the old, in with the new</strong> &#8211; Newspapers across the country have slashed jobs to deal with shrinking revenue, and many cited the departure of long-time journalists as their single greatest loss, according to The Changing Newsroom, a study of U.S. daily newspapers conducted by journalist Tyler Marshall and the <a href="http://journalism.org/">Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism</a>. Read all of the findings <a href="http://www.journalism.org/node/11961">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Young reporters leaving newspapers </strong>- At a time when newspapers have every reason  to innovate, some of their most progressive thinkers &#8211; young journalists &#8211; are leaving. Why? Frustration with the slow pace of change and papers&#8217; often-stifling top-down newsroom management style. Read more on the phenomena from MediaShift&#8217;s Mark Glaser <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2008/07/digging_deeperyoung_newspaper.html">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Twitter no threat to traditional reporting</strong> &#8211; John Dickerson, chief political correspondent for <a href="http://www.slate.com">Slate</a>, postulates in <a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reports/08-2NRsummer/p05-dickerson.html">this article</a> in Harvard University&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reports/index.html">Nieman Reports</a> that while Twitter isn&#8217;t the next great thing in journalism, it&#8217;s not the end of reporting as we know it either. The microblogging service has its uses, Dickerson says:</p>
<blockquote><p>Twitter is the perfect place for all of those asides I&#8217;ve scribbled in the hundreds of notebooks I have in my garage from the campaigns and stories I&#8217;ve covered over the years. Inside each of those notebooks are little pieces of color I&#8217;ve picked up along the way. Sometimes these snippets are too off-topic or too inconsequential to work into a story. Sometimes they are the little notions or sideways thoughts that become the lede of a piece or the kicker. All of them now have found a home on Twitter.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2008/07/28/around-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good reads on changes in online news business</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/07/14/good-reads-on-changes-in-online-news-business/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2008/07/14/good-reads-on-changes-in-online-news-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia Journalism Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ContentNext]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital media business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas McCollam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Glaser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaShift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PaidContent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafat Ali]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
To start the week, here&#8217;s a round up of recent stories about happenings in the online news business:
CJR on NY Times&#8217; online holdings &#8211; The cover story of the July/August issue of the Columbia Journalism Review, Sulzberger at the Barricades: Can Arthur Sulzberger Jr. transform The New York Times for the digital age? reveals the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2008%2F07%2F14%2Fgood-reads-on-changes-in-online-news-business%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2008%2F07%2F14%2Fgood-reads-on-changes-in-online-news-business%2F&amp;source=michellerafter&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>To start the week, here&#8217;s a round up of recent stories about happenings in the online news business:</p>
<p><strong>CJR on NY Times&#8217; online holdings</strong> &#8211; The cover story of the July/August issue of the <a href="http://www.cjr.org">Columbia Journalism Review</a>, <a href="http://www.cjr.org/cover_story/sulzberger_at_the_barricades.php?page=all">Sulzberger at the Barricades: Can Arthur Sulzberger Jr. transform <em>The New York Times</em> for the digital age?</a> reveals the paper&#8217;s digital business is gaining traction despite continuing financial woes on the print side. According to author Douglas McCollam, the Times&#8217; digital-only properties, including <a href="http://www.about.com">About.com</a>, the search service the paper purchased in 2005, still account for only 3 percent of its annual revenue. However, revenue from all digital media operations grew 10 percent in 2007, to $330 million, topping an 8 percent jump the previous year, according to McCollam. Still, McCollam asks:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;When will gains online realistically make up for losses on the print side? &#8220;We don&#8217;t know when digital revenues will offset the decline in print,&#8221; (Publisher Arthur) Sulzberger wrote in an email, adding that &#8220;this is a question we often ask ourselves.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Ironically, the article isn&#8217;t available on CJR&#8217;s Website yet, so if you&#8217;re not a subscriber you&#8217;ll have to find a copy or wait until it appears online. <em><strong>7/16 UPDATE:</strong> The story is now online, and I added the link above.</em></p>
<p><strong>Glaser on the demise of OJR</strong> &#8211; As I previously discussed on these pages, the University of Southern California&#8217;s Annenberg School for Communications recently <a href="http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/online-journalism-review-shuttered-niles-starts-sensibletalk/">shut down the Online Journalism Review</a>, which had been charting the course of online news for more than a decade. This week, <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/info/about-mark.html" class="broken_link" >Mark Glaser</a> used his MediaShift column at <a href="http://www.pbs.org">PBS</a> to &#8220;dig deeper&#8221; into the story, revealing that with a new dean and director of the journalism program, the school is in transition and rethinking where OJR fits in. Glaser raises a couple excellent points: can a school without faculty devoted to teaching online news support a Website devoted to the subject, and when all news is moving online, is the idea of an academic journal devoted to online news outdated? Read more <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>PaidContent purchased for $30 million</strong> &#8211; It&#8217;s not every day a single blogger turns a passion for reporting on the online news business into a sustainable enterprise and then <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/12/business/media/12paid.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">gets bought out for a reported $30 million</a>. But that&#8217;s what happened to Rafat Ali, founder of <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/">PaidContent</a>, a six-year-old news site covering all types of paid-content business models, which he sold last week to <a href="http://www.gmgplc.co.uk/Ourbusinesses/GuardianNewsMedia/tabid/129/Default.aspx">Guardian News and Media</a>, a British newspaper publisher. By Ali&#8217;s account, Guardian will run ContentNext, the parent company Ali started to run PaidContent and several related blogs, as a stand-alone business. Read all the details <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-contentnext-20-life-under-the-guardian-media-group/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2008/07/14/good-reads-on-changes-in-online-news-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
