<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WordCount &#187; Mark Glaser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellerafter.com/tag/mark-glaser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellerafter.com</link>
	<description>Freelancing in the Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:55:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Good reads on changes in online news business</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/07/14/good-reads-on-changes-in-online-news-business/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2008/07/14/good-reads-on-changes-in-online-news-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia Journalism Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ContentNext]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital media business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas McCollam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Glaser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaShift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PaidContent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafat Ali]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To start the week, here&#8217;s a round up of recent stories about happenings in the online news business: CJR on NY Times&#8217; online holdings &#8211; The cover story of the July/August issue of the Columbia Journalism Review, Sulzberger at the Barricades: Can Arthur Sulzberger Jr. transform The New York Times for the digital age? reveals [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To start the week, here&#8217;s a round up of recent stories about happenings in the online news business:</p>
<p><strong>CJR on NY Times&#8217; online holdings</strong> &#8211; The cover story of the July/August issue of the <a href="http://www.cjr.org">Columbia Journalism Review</a>, <a href="http://www.cjr.org/cover_story/sulzberger_at_the_barricades.php?page=all">Sulzberger at the Barricades: Can Arthur Sulzberger Jr. transform <em>The New York Times</em> for the digital age?</a> reveals the paper&#8217;s digital business is gaining traction despite continuing financial woes on the print side. According to author Douglas McCollam, the Times&#8217; digital-only properties, including <a href="http://www.about.com">About.com</a>, the search service the paper purchased in 2005, still account for only 3 percent of its annual revenue. However, revenue from all digital media operations grew 10 percent in 2007, to $330 million, topping an 8 percent jump the previous year, according to McCollam. Still, McCollam asks:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;When will gains online realistically make up for losses on the print side? &#8220;We don&#8217;t know when digital revenues will offset the decline in print,&#8221; (Publisher Arthur) Sulzberger wrote in an email, adding that &#8220;this is a question we often ask ourselves.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Ironically, the article isn&#8217;t available on CJR&#8217;s Website yet, so if you&#8217;re not a subscriber you&#8217;ll have to find a copy or wait until it appears online. <em><strong>7/16 UPDATE:</strong> The story is now online, and I added the link above.</em></p>
<p><strong>Glaser on the demise of OJR</strong> &#8211; As I previously discussed on these pages, the University of Southern California&#8217;s Annenberg School for Communications recently <a href="http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/online-journalism-review-shuttered-niles-starts-sensibletalk/">shut down the Online Journalism Review</a>, which had been charting the course of online news for more than a decade. This week, <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/info/about-mark.html" class="broken_link">Mark Glaser</a> used his MediaShift column at <a href="http://www.pbs.org">PBS</a> to &#8220;dig deeper&#8221; into the story, revealing that with a new dean and director of the journalism program, the school is in transition and rethinking where OJR fits in. Glaser raises a couple excellent points: can a school without faculty devoted to teaching online news support a Website devoted to the subject, and when all news is moving online, is the idea of an academic journal devoted to online news outdated? Read more <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>PaidContent purchased for $30 million</strong> &#8211; It&#8217;s not every day a single blogger turns a passion for reporting on the online news business into a sustainable enterprise and then <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/12/business/media/12paid.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">gets bought out for a reported $30 million</a>. But that&#8217;s what happened to Rafat Ali, founder of <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/">PaidContent</a>, a six-year-old news site covering all types of paid-content business models, which he sold last week to <a href="http://www.gmgplc.co.uk/Ourbusinesses/GuardianNewsMedia/tabid/129/Default.aspx">Guardian News and Media</a>, a British newspaper publisher. By Ali&#8217;s account, Guardian will run ContentNext, the parent company Ali started to run PaidContent and several related blogs, as a stand-alone business. Read all the details <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-contentnext-20-life-under-the-guardian-media-group/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2008/07/14/good-reads-on-changes-in-online-news-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time out: why writers need to unplug on the weekends</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/06/13/why-writers-need-to-unplug-on-the-weekends/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2008/06/13/why-writers-need-to-unplug-on-the-weekends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freelancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Glaser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taking a break from the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology sabbath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology sabbatical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you use rechargeable batteries you know they don&#8217;t last forever. They work, they run low and then you recharge them. Writers are like that too. We can&#8217;t work non-stop without the juices running low. But if you&#8217;re like me and you spend your work life tied to a computer, email and the Internet, it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you use rechargeable batteries you know they don&#8217;t last forever. They work, they run low and then you recharge them.</p>
<p>Writers are like that too. We can&#8217;t work non-stop without the juices running low. But if you&#8217;re like me and you spend your work life tied to a computer, email and the Internet, it&#8217;s not always easy to unplug.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s worth it. And more writers are talking about it. One example is <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/info/about-mark.html" class="broken_link">Mark Glaser</a>, a writer, columnist and blogger who writes the <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/">MediaShift</a> column on the <a href="http://www.pbs.org">PBS.org</a> Website. Glaser, who has written for <a href="http://www.latimes.com">Los Angeles Times</a>, <a href="http://www.cnet.com">CNET</a> and The Industry Standard (<em>Disclaimer: I wrote for <strong>TIS</strong> too but didn&#8217;t know Glaser</em>), recently wrote about his quest for more time unplugged from his computer in a column called <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2008/06/digging_deepertechnology_sabba.html">&#8216;Technology Sabbath&#8217; offers one day to unplug</a>. He writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;being that I am Jewish — though not very religious — I decided to shut down the computer each Friday night at sunset until Saturday at sunset, the traditional time of the Jewish Sabbath. I make exceptions when I need to get directions or check for a personal email. I still use my cell phone but try to limit it to personal calls only. While this day of technological rest can be a difficult routine, it has allowed me to stretch my time, spend more hours outside and be with people more in face-to-face settings.</p>
<p>And I’m not alone. The concept of a &#8220;technology sabbath&#8221; is becoming more widespread, both in religious circles and among bloggers and media people who are overwhelmed with the always-on nature of the broadband Internet and smartphones. And that overwhelming feeling is exacerbated by instant messaging, social networking and services such as <a href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter</a>, that allow us to do more informal communications electronically rather than in person.</p></blockquote>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t consciously decided to take a tech break every week. But in the past two to three months &#8211; especially since I&#8217;ve been blogging more regularly &#8211; I&#8217;ve sought out the solace of hiking in the woods almost every weekend as an antidote to the amount of time I spend in front of a screen. Luckily for me, the woodsy trails of Portland&#8217;s <a href="http://www.portlandonline.com/parks/finder/index.cfm?PropertyID=127&amp;action=ViewPark">Forest Park</a> are less than 10 minutes away. There&#8217;s something incredibly regenerating about being in a place that&#8217;s the antithesis of the plugged in world. It&#8217;s like a tonic, and only takes an hour or two.</p>
<p>What about you? Do you unplug on a regular basis? What do you do to recharge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2008/06/13/why-writers-need-to-unplug-on-the-weekends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 682/682 objects using disk: basic

Served from: michellerafter.com @ 2012-05-25 01:54:44 -->
