<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WordCountmagazine trends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellerafter.com/tag/magazine-trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellerafter.com</link>
	<description>Freelancing in the Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:30:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Top 13 warning signs a magazine is in trouble</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2009/02/23/top-12-warning-signs-a-magazine-is-in-trouble/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2009/02/23/top-12-warning-signs-a-magazine-is-in-trouble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freelance writing tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freelancing and bad economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freelancing for magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines in trouble]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=2021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Magazines have folded by the dozen since the economy started its now infamous nose dive last fall. But most didn&#8217;t disappear overnight. Over the months, observant freelancers learned to read between the lines for signs a particular publication might be cutting back or, alas, shutting down completely.
Here are some indicators that all may not be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2009%2F02%2F23%2Ftop-12-warning-signs-a-magazine-is-in-trouble%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2009%2F02%2F23%2Ftop-12-warning-signs-a-magazine-is-in-trouble%2F&amp;source=michellerafter&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Magazines have folded by the dozen since the economy started its now infamous nose dive last fall. But most didn&#8217;t disappear overnight. Over the months, observant freelancers learned to read between the lines for signs a particular publication might be cutting back or, alas, shutting down completely.</p>
<p>Here are some indicators that all may not be well, based on my personal experience and with the help of some fellow freelancers on <a href="http://www.freelancesuccess.com">my favorite writers&#8217; message board</a>.</p>
<p><strong>You know a magazine is in trouble when&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>1. Emails to the editor you&#8217;ve been working with on an assignment suddenly bounce back, her voicemail is full and she&#8217;s not answering her phone.</p>
<p>2. They aren&#8217;t assigning anything new for the foreseeable future and are using up their backlog of already completed &#8211; and paid for &#8211; stories instead.</p>
<p>3. They&#8217;re using staffers &#8211; and editors &#8211; to write everything.</p>
<p>4. They&#8217;re using consultants, analysts and other industry experts to write columns instead of freelancers.</p>
<p>5. Instead of professionally written stories, they&#8217;re using message boards and other user-generated content to flesh out their Website.</p>
<p>6. They&#8217;ve switched to paying on publication instead of on acceptance.</p>
<p>7. They ask you to send a self-addressed stamped envelope along with your invoice.</p>
<p>8. Instead of sending your invoice to the lowly editorial assistant who&#8217;s handled the task forever you&#8217;ve been directed to send them straight to the assistant managing editor.</p>
<p>9. Invoices that used to be paid within 30 days or even less are now paid in 45 days &#8211; if you&#8217;re lucky.</p>
<p>10. They ask you to accept a smaller fee or lower per-word rate than what&#8217;s stipulated in your contract in order to get paid.</p>
<p>11. They love your story but hold it for a month for budget reasons and, despite the payment terms spelled out in your contract, demand that you to hold off sending an invoice for a month too.</p>
<p>12. They can&#8217;t find your invoice &#8211; again.</p>
<p>13. The latest issue comes in the mail and you mistake it for a promotional brochure.</p>
<p>What warning signs do you look for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2009/02/23/top-12-warning-signs-a-magazine-is-in-trouble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carlson bids adieu to Post&#039;s Magazine Reader column</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/05/28/carlson-bids-adieu-to-posts-magazine-reader-column/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2008/05/28/carlson-bids-adieu-to-posts-magazine-reader-column/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American magazine industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Carlson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
For a great take on what&#8217;s happened to the U.S. magazine business over the past dozen years, be sure to catch Washington Post staff writer Peter Carlson&#8217;s latest and last entry in his column, The Magazine Reader.
Carlson&#8217;s finale is titled &#8220;Looking at 12 Years Between the Covers&#8221;. In it he chronicles the magazines that came [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2008%2F05%2F28%2Fcarlson-bids-adieu-to-posts-magazine-reader-column%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellerafter.com%2F2008%2F05%2F28%2Fcarlson-bids-adieu-to-posts-magazine-reader-column%2F&amp;source=michellerafter&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>For a great take on what&#8217;s happened to the U.S. magazine business over the past dozen years, be sure to catch <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com">Washington Post</a> staff writer Peter Carlson&#8217;s latest and last entry in his column, The Magazine Reader.</p>
<p>Carlson&#8217;s finale is titled <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/26/AR2008052602183.html">&#8220;Looking at 12 Years Between the Covers&#8221;</a>. In it he chronicles the magazines that came and went, and a few trends that hit the business during his 12-year tenure: the <em><a href="http://maxim.com/index.aspx">Maxim</a></em>-ization of U.S. mens&#8217; magazines, the onslaught of &#8220;me&#8221; magazine also-rans that followed in the wake of the very successful launch of <em><a href="http://www.oprah.com/omagazine/omag_landing.jhtml">O: The Oprah Magazine</a></em>, and the comforting constancy of the sex tips that run month in and month out in women&#8217;s glossies like <em><a href="http://www.cosmopolitan.com/">Cosmopolitan</a></em> and <em><a href="http://www.glamour.com/">Glamour</a></em>.</p>
<p>Carlson, who chronicled the ups and downs, start ups and demises of American magazines, is taking the Post&#8217;s <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/22/AR2008052203753.html">early retirement buyout</a> and &#8220;heading off to pursue other interests, such as sloth and gin,&#8221; he writes in the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2008/05/28/carlson-bids-adieu-to-posts-magazine-reader-column/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
