<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WordCount &#187; Akismet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellerafter.com/tag/akismet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellerafter.com</link>
	<description>Freelancing in the Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:04:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blog comment tutorial: attract the good, deal with the bad</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2011/09/29/blog-comment-tutorial-attract-the-good-deal-with-the-bad/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2011/09/29/blog-comment-tutorial-attract-the-good-deal-with-the-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akismet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DISQUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to get more blog comments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.com/?p=8165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, you can attract more comments on your blog, and keep them civil. Read on for all the advice shared by bloggers during last week's #wclw chat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to get more blog comments? Write about personal or controversial topics, or share widely-held but little discussed how-to information, or post links to what you write on Facebook.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just some of the advice on how to get more comments on your blog posts that was shared during last week&#8217;s WordCount Last Wednesday monthly Twitter chat for writers.</p>
<p>Writers and  bloggers also talked about dealing with fans who think nothing of responding to blog posts on a related Facebook page, but wouldn&#8217;t be caught dead leaving a comment on the actual post, and about how they deal with readers who leave mean comments.</p>
<p>Read on:</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>How to get more comments on blog posts</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>@MathforGrownups,</strong> Laura Laing, a Baltimore journalist and author of the new book, Math for Grownups &#8211; <strong>Personal posts</strong>, especially when I ask folks to tell me their stories. There&#8217;s not a whole lot that&#8217;s personal about math, but people are always eager to share their math stories, teacher was mean, etc. Also, controversial posts. Oh, and when I make a math mistake, someone always chimes in to tell me.</p>
<p><strong>@sarahmorgan</strong>, Sarah Morgan, a New Jersey writer covering personal and social media &#8211; Blog posts (that get) the most comments are <strong>intensely personal or teach people how to do something</strong>. My post with the most comments was after one of my best friends died. Depressing but true.</p>
<p><strong>@MichelleRafter</strong>, that&#8217;s me!- Agree about <strong>controversial posts</strong>. I got most comments ever on pieces debating writing for content mills. I also started adding a line to bottom of post asking: &#8220;What do you think?&#8221; or &#8220;What&#8217;s your experience?&#8221; to solicit feedback. It works. I&#8217;ve also had good success running polls. People love taking polls and <a href="http://www.polldaddy.com">Polldaddy</a> makes it simple if you have a WordPress or WordPress.com blog.</p>
<p><strong>@jenwillis</strong>, a Portland, Oregon, freelancer covering living, religion, history and health current in Dublin, Ireland, on a fellowship &#8211; For me, it&#8217;s usually when I <strong>share writing advice</strong>. Or when people start wars with each other in the comments on my posts.</p>
<p><strong>@UrbanMuseWriter</strong>, Susan Johnston, a Boston freelancer who covers small biz and personal finance &#8211; When I post <strong>unconventional advice</strong> or find a topic that hits a nerve with people it tends to generate comments. Topics that are relatable, for instance, challenges that many freelancers face but few discuss. Also, I get more comments when I&#8217;m <strong>hosting a giveaway</strong> and people need to leave a comment to enter.</p>
<p><strong>@JanUdlock</strong>, Jan Udlock, a Portland, Oregon writer for regional parenting mags, and blogger at IMP3RfecCt Mom &#8211; Giveaways get the highest number of comments. I&#8217;ve given away books and ebooks. I find it important to comment on people&#8217;s comments. They feel more engaged.</p>
<p><strong>@riverand</strong>, Nicole Rivera, blogger, techie, foodie and a ton more &#8211; I find I get more comments when working within a blogging community, i.e., SitsGirls, BlogFrog or WriteOnEdge.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>I get more comments on Facebook than on my blog, is that a problem?</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>@ThoughtsHappen</strong>, Louise Julig, a San Diego marketing writer &#8211; Getting comments is hard for me. I <strong>get more comments on the Facebook</strong> page for my blog than on blog itself. I think non-writer people feel &#8216;safer&#8217; on Facebook than posting right on the blog. I have the Facebook &#8216;Like&#8217; box, but don&#8217;t know how to get the feed yet.</p>
<p><strong>@jenwillis</strong> I&#8217;ve had a similar experience with comments on Facebook v. comments on the actual blog post.</p>
<p><strong>@wordwhacker</strong>, Linda Bernstein, New York City writer and blogger at GenerationBSquared &#8211; I get more comments through Facebook, Google+, email or Twitter than in the comment box on my blogs.</p>
<p><strong>@AmyVernon</strong>, ex-newspaper reporter turned social media superstar  - That&#8217;s <strong>not really a problem, as long as they&#8217;re actually reading and sharing</strong>, that&#8217;s the important part. NPR, for example, found they were getting more comments on Facebook than on their site. But <a href="http://t.co/TEnJA90E">visits and shares exploded</a>. I believe that&#8217;s completely scalable no matter the size of your audience, too.</p>
<p><strong>@MichelleRafter</strong> Getting comments on Facebook shows how important it is to be on social networks, and channel that back to your blog. I&#8217;ve kept Facebook for non-work stuff, so I don&#8217;t put links to my posts there either. But I put the <strong>FB &#8216;Like&#8217; box on my blog&#8217;s social sharing toolbar</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>@JanUdlock</strong> I find there are moms that don&#8217;t want to leave comments on my blog for personal space issues, but will on Facebook. If <strong>social media is not their thing, they won&#8217;t comment</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>@sarahmorgan</strong> I also find that I get comments on Facebook rather than on the actual post. Frustrating, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p><strong>@riverand </strong> Also, <strong>replying on someone&#8217;s blog</strong>, rather than on your own can often be even more valuable! I get non-bloggy/writers on Facebook. Each audience has their space.</p>
<p><strong>@MichelleRafter</strong> I added StumbleUpon, Reddit boxes to my social media toolbar this year, that generates some additional comments but Reddit readers comment on posts on Reddit &amp; StumbleUpon generates mostly drive-by page views and no comments.</p>
<p><strong>@ThoughtsHappen</strong> I have also <strong>gotten comments on LinkedIn groups</strong> that I put a blog post in discussion, but the post has to be very relevant to the group.</p>
<p><strong>@AmyVernon</strong> You need to communicate where the people are, and they&#8217;re fragmented. Plus, Facebook comments tend to be more civil because they&#8217;re not anonymous.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Dealing with trolls, bullies and nasties</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>@jenwillis</strong> I moderate all comments. They don&#8217;t post online unless I approve them. If someone offers an alternative view and is making a good point, I let it through. If it&#8217;s <strong>nastiness for the sake of being nasty, I trash it</strong>. Maybe that&#8217;s censorship, but it&#8217;s my blog space.</p>
<p><strong>@MathforGrownups</strong> I put on my big-girl panties and respond respectfully and with logic. That is, only if the comments are not abusive. My blog is my house, and I control who can speak there.</p>
<p><strong>@wordwhacker</strong> I just don&#8217;t approve nastiness. But I almost never get it, probably because of my subject.</p>
<p><strong>@MathforGrownups</strong> What&#8217;s even more interesting is to get nastiness on another blog or elsewhere on the internet. Then responding or not is critical.</p>
<p><strong>@ThoughtsHappen</strong> I rarely if ever get nastiness, but I think that&#8217;s because I don&#8217;t get many comments overall. That is one benefit of Facebook though.</p>
<p><strong>@wordwhacker</strong> I see on Google+ all these mommy bloggers talking about <strong>mommy bullying</strong> through blogs. I find that weird.</p>
<p><strong>@ThoughtsHappen</strong> Good grief. People don&#8217;t have enough to do w/out bullying each other on the net? Dumb.</p>
<p><strong>@wordwhacker</strong> Yes, agree, especially for these mommy bloggers.</p>
<p><strong>@MichelleRafter</strong> If a reader presents an alternative point of view in a comment, do you debate it, thank them for sharing, let others respond or let it go?</p>
<p><strong>@riverand</strong> On Reddit there can be lots of nastiness for nastiness sake, so I take it from the source and decide when to engage in a debate.</p>
<p><strong>@MathforGrownups</strong> Depends. Sometimes I debate it. But there is almost always a time to let it go.</p>
<p><strong>@MichelleRafter</strong> Laura, can you share what happened to you?</p>
<p><strong>@MathforGrownups</strong> <em>USA Weekend</em> wrote <strong>a story about my book with incorrect info</strong>. Commenters on that site pointed out the error. I responded to say that the book is right, story wrong. It got picked up by HuffPost, CJR and others. People were furious! <em>USA Weekend</em> didn&#8217;t correct the mistake soon enough. There was a huge online uproar, and I had to decide where and when to respond. Today there are two bad reviews on Amazon for my book, both referencing the <em>USA Weekend</em> story and I decided not to respond. But I did blog about it and got some negative comments. We had a little back and forth on my own blog. Pretty harmless and easy.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>To moderate or not to moderate comments, that&#8217;s the question</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>@MathforGrownups</strong> Yes, <strong>I moderate comments</strong>, just through WordPress.</p>
<p><strong>@MichelleRafter</strong> I moderate comments, but don&#8217;t use CAPTCHA or something like it. I want to make it as easy as possible for people to give feedback.</p>
<p><strong>@jenwillis</strong> I do moderate comments, using my blog&#8217;s WordPress backbone.</p>
<p><strong>@riverand</strong> I use <a href="http://www.disqus.com">DISQUS</a> and recently found out this confuses my non-blogger followers. I&#8217;ve loved it until I had two different Facebook followers say, &#8220;I&#8217;m writing this here because I can&#8217;t figure that thing out!&#8221; I&#8217;m planning on a how-to post now.</p>
<p><strong>@sarahmorgan</strong> I don&#8217;t moderate but I do review after they go up.</p>
<p><strong>@wordwhacker</strong> I do moderate comments. I have a spam filter and then a plugin to my email and I moderate by hand. The filter gets all the spam. Amazing.</p>
<p><strong>@ThoughtsHappen</strong> Is the spam filter part of WordPress? My blog is not on WordPress but I&#8217;m thinking of migrating.</p>
<p><strong>@MichelleRafter</strong> Use a plug in called <a href="http://www.akismet.com">Akismet</a>.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><br />
</strong></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2011/09/29/blog-comment-tutorial-attract-the-good-deal-with-the-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go Web, Young Man</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/01/25/go-web-young-man/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michellerafter.com/2008/01/25/go-web-young-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freelancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[About.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akismet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automattic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E.W. Scripps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movable Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper business sections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orange County Register]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russ Stanton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Six Apart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TypePad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Economic Forum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newspapers see the future, and it&#8217;s digital. The latest evidence: earlier this week the New York Times Co. and three other investors sank $29.5 million into Automattic, the company that makes WordPress blogging software runs the WordPress.com free blogging Website. (Disclaimer: I use WordPress.com to create and host this blog.) According to a news report, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://michellerafter.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/home_project_wordpresscom.png" title="WordPress"><img src="http://michellerafter.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/home_project_wordpresscom.thumbnail.png" alt="WordPress" /></a><a href="http://michellerafter.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/ny-times-logo_250.jpg" title="ny-times-logo_250.jpg"><img src="http://michellerafter.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/ny-times-logo_250.thumbnail.jpg" alt="ny-times-logo_250.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>Newspapers see the future, and it&#8217;s digital. The latest evidence: earlier this week the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com">New York Times Co.</a> and three other investors sank $29.5 million into <a href="http://www.automattic.com">Automattic</a>, the company that <strike>makes <a href="http://www.wordpress.org">WordPress</a> blogging software</strike> runs the <a href="http://www.wordpress.com">WordPress.com</a> free blogging Website. (Disclaimer: I use WordPress.com to create and host this blog.)</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/23/business/media/23nytimes.html?ref=media">a news report</a>, the Times was the smallest of the four investors &#8211; the others were venture capital firms. But the deal solidifies the paper&#8217;s existing relationship with Automattic, which the Times uses to host about 50 blogs, as well as <a href="http://www.about.com">About.com</a>, the Internet information service it acquired in 2005.</p>
<p>As the Times investments illustrate, newspapers&#8217; embrace of digital media has moved beyond erecting Web sites and asking reporters to write blogs. Consider:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://scripps.com/">E.W. Scripps</a>, the Cincinnati media conglomerate, is so jazzed about the prospects of its TV and online ventures the company is set to spin them off into a separate public company later this year.</li>
<li>Ruport Murdoch, new owner of the <a href="http://www.wsj.com">Wall Street Journal</a>, told the <a href="http://www.weforum.org/">World Economic Forum</a> in Davos, Switzerland, on Thursday that he will <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/jan/25/digitalmedia.rupertmurdoch?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=media">keep subscriptions</a> for the paper&#8217;s online version, though prices will be higher and some &#8220;commodity&#8221; financial information will be free.</li>
<li>I&#8217;ve already written about how the <a href="http://www.latimes.com">Los Angeles Times&#8217;</a> Innovations (read Web site) editor, Russ Stanton, is being mentioned as a front runner for the now vacant editor-in-chief gig.</li>
</ul>
<p>At the same time, newspapers&#8217; economic prospects are looking dim. The latest on that front: the <a href="http://www.ocregister.com">Orange County Register</a>, my old stomping grounds and the place I got started as a tech reporter, <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/news/news-section-register-1962455-business-newspaper">is killing its stand-alone Business section</a> and folding it into the News section in one of several cost-cutting measures. When it does, it&#8217;ll be the only major daily in the country without a separate Business section. Ouch.</p>
<p>What does it mean for freelancers? Bone up on your coding skills. Seriously, as newspapers go through this transition to digital, it&#8217;s more important than ever to keep up with the times, and the Times. Maintaining a blog is one way. Seeking out Web-based work is another. If you don&#8217;t believe me, this blog post from <a href="http://www.publishing2.com">Publishing 2.0</a> called <a href="http://publishing2.com/2008/01/21/the-only-way-for-journalists-to-understand-the-web-is-to-use-it/#more-963">The Only Way for Journalists to Understand the Web is Use It</a> says it a lot more eloquently than I can.</p>
<p>That leads me back to Automattic. The investment is great news for the two-year-old start up, whose major competition includes <a href="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</a>, which <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> bought in 2003. Other blogging software makers don&#8217;t have such deep pockets, but there are a lot of them, including <a href="http://www.sixapart.com">Six Apart</a>, which makes <a href="http://www.movabletype.com">Movable Type</a> and <a href="http://www.typepad.com">TypePad</a>, plus a host of smaller proprietary and open-source blogging software makers. Automattic said it will use the investment to beef up projects like <a href="http://akismet.com/">Akismet</a>, a blog comment spam blocker.</p>
<p><b> Updated on February 27, 2008:</b> Thanks to the sharp-eyed reader who pointed out that WordPress is open source software. Automattic uses it to run the WordPress.com blogging Website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michellerafter.com/2008/01/25/go-web-young-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

