<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech cliches we never want to hear or write again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellerafter.com/2008/08/29/tech-cliches-we-never-want-to-hear-or-write-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/08/29/tech-cliches-we-never-want-to-hear-or-write-again/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Freelancing in the Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:10:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle V. Rafter</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/08/29/tech-cliches-we-never-want-to-hear-or-write-again/comment-page-1/#comment-92743</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle V. Rafter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=553#comment-92743</guid>
		<description>Love it. It&#039;s also time to dump &quot;build your brand,&quot; no?

Michelle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it. It&#8217;s also time to dump &#8220;build your brand,&#8221; no?</p>
<p>Michelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/08/29/tech-cliches-we-never-want-to-hear-or-write-again/comment-page-1/#comment-92517</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=553#comment-92517</guid>
		<description>3 years late to this post, but I love it. This type of tech or corporate babble is one my big pet peeves. How about &quot;add value&quot;? Not limited to the tech world but mighty irritating in my book!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 years late to this post, but I love it. This type of tech or corporate babble is one my big pet peeves. How about &#8220;add value&#8221;? Not limited to the tech world but mighty irritating in my book!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technical clichés &#171; Science Notes</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/08/29/tech-cliches-we-never-want-to-hear-or-write-again/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Technical clichés &#171; Science Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=553#comment-522</guid>
		<description>[...] Technical&#160;clichés 2008 August 30, Saturday, 12:00 &#8212; monado   Michelle Vranizan Rafter suggests a list of technical clichés we can do without. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Technical&nbsp;clichés 2008 August 30, Saturday, 12:00 &#8212; monado   Michelle Vranizan Rafter suggests a list of technical clichés we can do without. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwen</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/08/29/tech-cliches-we-never-want-to-hear-or-write-again/comment-page-1/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=553#comment-521</guid>
		<description>Michelle: Great post. I think the issue of whether jargon is good or bad can be one of those things that is easy to oversimplify. I recently wrote about how not all jargon is created equal. Some of it can be useful in business settings, for a variety of reasons.



FWIW.

Best,
Gwen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle: Great post. I think the issue of whether jargon is good or bad can be one of those things that is easy to oversimplify. I recently wrote about how not all jargon is created equal. Some of it can be useful in business settings, for a variety of reasons.</p>
<p>FWIW.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Gwen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ryan Recabar</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/08/29/tech-cliches-we-never-want-to-hear-or-write-again/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ryan Recabar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 07:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=553#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Blunders relating to language, especially in new technology, are irritating. They cause confusion rather than lead to understanding, not to mention that they do not sound good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blunders relating to language, especially in new technology, are irritating. They cause confusion rather than lead to understanding, not to mention that they do not sound good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shizelbs</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/08/29/tech-cliches-we-never-want-to-hear-or-write-again/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>shizelbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=553#comment-519</guid>
		<description>You hit the nail on the head regarding &#039;meme&#039;.  Thanks to your post I&#039;ll be able to sleep tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You hit the nail on the head regarding &#8216;meme&#8217;.  Thanks to your post I&#8217;ll be able to sleep tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Weiner</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/08/29/tech-cliches-we-never-want-to-hear-or-write-again/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Weiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=553#comment-518</guid>
		<description>Michelle,

Thank you for your shout out!

This is another fun post. &quot;Mitigate&quot; is one of the words I love to hate when I read about investments.

Susan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle,</p>
<p>Thank you for your shout out!</p>
<p>This is another fun post. &#8220;Mitigate&#8221; is one of the words I love to hate when I read about investments.</p>
<p>Susan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Rafter</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/08/29/tech-cliches-we-never-want-to-hear-or-write-again/comment-page-1/#comment-517</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Rafter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=553#comment-517</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good one!

Michelle Rafter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good one!</p>
<p>Michelle Rafter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charmian Christie</title>
		<link>http://michellerafter.com/2008/08/29/tech-cliches-we-never-want-to-hear-or-write-again/comment-page-1/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Charmian Christie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellerafter.wordpress.com/?p=553#comment-516</guid>
		<description>Since he included &quot;at the end of the day&quot; I&#039;ll add &quot;going forward&quot;. Very irritating. Just use the simple future tense and be done with it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since he included &#8220;at the end of the day&#8221; I&#8217;ll add &#8220;going forward&#8221;. Very irritating. Just use the simple future tense and be done with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

